For university procurement and research compliance

University Vendor Receipt

Federal awards require you to check SAM exclusions before contracting and to keep the evidence. Subrecipient monitoring needs the single-audit record. Both are on one receipt with the file dates.

For public and private universities, research offices, foundations. Keys accepted: UEI · EIN · IPEDS unit ID. Matching is exact key or exact printed name; nothing is inferred, scored or labelled.

What is on the receipt

SAM.gov exclusions + entity registration by UEI
Federal Audit Clearinghouse single-audit filings by name
USAspending awards to the exact recipient name
IRS Automatic Revocation and Publication 78
State business registry rows (CT, CO, NY, OR, PA, VA, FL) with file dates
Rescued HIFLD Colleges & Universities layer by IPEDS unit ID, custody stated

Priced per proof event

Roster 150: $3,600 a year, up to 150 names re-read monthly — $2.00 per receipt at a full list; Roster 500: $9,999 a year. Net 30 on invoice or purchase order, W-9 on request.

Partner API: Basic $99/month for 5,000 single receipts (2¢ each beyond), Monitor $499/month for 50,000 with pasted lists and watchlists (1¢ beyond). Terms on /partners.

No seats, no per-user licences. A single free receipt is always available at /screening.

See one

A live sample receipt for this sector, re-run against today's files:

Open the sample receipt

Every receipt conforms to Receipt Format v1 and is issued under the Verification Integrity Standard. Start a pilot at /pilot.

Citing a receipt as audit evidence

Request the receipt with your award, PIID or invoice reference (ref=); the reference is bound into the SHA-256 and printed, never interpreted.
File the JSON and the print page. The citation line on the receipt names the registry id, read time and hash.
An auditor re-runs the same name and keys at /screening or checks the held copy at /r/<id>; the registry confirms the hash without any login.
Where a source is listed as not read, the receipt says so; the auditor's workpaper should treat that source as unchecked, not as clear.