◆ Alpha CovenantFor businesses

Hanwha QCells USA Corp

Printed copies carry the source links and the time pulled (2026-09-25 16:28 UTC); the live record may have changed since.Archive hash of 2026-09-24: 0f64691ffabfee3f… · OpenTimestamps proof available
Uses only the facts on this page; every sentence shows which one.

HHS-OIG exclusion list (LEIE)

No entry under this exact name in the OIG file fetched 2026-09-23.

An entry means OIG excluded this business name from participation in federal health care programs under the cited authority; a reinstatement date means the exclusion ended. No entry under a name means only that this exact name is not in the file — it says nothing about other names, owners or affiliates, and is not a statement of compliance.

Matched on: exact business name as printed in the OIG file (case-insensitive). Source: HHS Office of Inspector General — LEIE (monthly downloadable file) · file fetched 2026-09-23 · recheck at OIG ↗ · what the authority codes mean ↗

Federal contracts and recipient identity (USAspending.gov)

Checking federal contracts…

Exploited vulnerabilities in this vendor's products — CISA KEV

No KEV entry names “Hanwha QCells USA Corp” as vendor (exact name). Search the catalog for brands or subsidiaries.

Source: CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities Catalog

Health-record breach reports filed by this entity — HHS OCR

No report under OCR review lists “Hanwha QCells USA Corp” as the covered entity (exact name; reports submitted in the last 24 months).

cyber-2026-06: a breach report is attributed only where the covered entity name filed with OCR equals the entity's name after removing corporate suffixes. A breach report is the entity's own notification to HHS under the Breach Notification Rule, listed while OCR reviews it. It is not a finding of fault. Only breaches affecting 500 or more people appear; resolved cases move to OCR's archive, which is not included here.

Source: HHS Office for Civil Rights — Breach Portal (cases currently under investigation)

Show the formula lens — the Covenant Score, a computed index for companies and institutions (published formula, version history on /methodology)

Covenant Score — a computed index

C75/100
  • Federal complaint trend vs market (CFPB): 85 complaints last 12mo, +142.9% vs prior year; all CFPB complaints moved +45.3% in the same window → +97.6 points vs the market
  • Relief rate vs market (CFPB): 0.0% of closed complaints ended with relief; market 31.6% → -31.6 points vs the market
  • Missed 15-day response window (CFPB): 0.0% of complaints answered late; market 0.41%
  • Product safety recalls (24 months): 0 matched recall(s)
  • Federal court records: 1 matching records — shown, never scored: litigation volume scales with company size and a case is not a verdict
cite this figure ↗
Reproduce this score — 24 steps, every input a public API call
  1. 1.Company complaints, last 12 months (hits.total.value)85open call ↗
  2. 2.Company complaints, prior 12 months35open call ↗
  3. 3.Company change % = (step1 − step2) ÷ step2 × 100142.9
  4. 4.ALL CFPB complaints, last 12 months6901642open call ↗
  5. 5.ALL CFPB complaints, prior 12 months4749611open call ↗
  6. 6.Market change % = (step4 − step5) ÷ step5 × 10045.3
  7. 7.Excess = step3 − step6 (points vs market)97.6
  8. 8.Trend points: needs ≥20 complaints; excess ≤ −10 → +3 · < +10 → 0 · < +25 → −5 · < +50 → −10 · else −15-15
  9. 9.Company closed with monetary relief, last 365 days—open call ↗
  10. 10.Company closed with non-monetary relief, last 365 days (step9 + step10 = relief)0open call ↗
  11. 11.Company closed with explanation, last 365 days77open call ↗
  12. 12.Relief % = relief ÷ (relief + explanation) × 1000
  13. 13.Market relief % of closed (company_response buckets in step 4's aggregations)31.6
  14. 14.Relief points: gap = step12 − step13; ≥ +10 → +5 · > −5 → 0 · > −15 → −5 · else −10-10
  15. 15.Company complaints answered late (timely=No), last 365 days—open call ↗
  16. 16.Company complaints total, last 365 days; late % = step15 ÷ step16 × 1000open call ↗
  17. 17.Market late % (timely buckets in step 4's aggregations)0.41
  18. 18.Late points: ≥ 5% → −5 · ≥ 3× market (min 1%) → −2 · else 00
  19. 19.FDA enforcement recalls naming the firm, 24 months0open call ↗
  20. 20.CPSC recalls with this manufacturer, 24 months0open call ↗
  21. 21.Recall points = −5 per matched recall, floor −150
  22. 22.Federal court records (shown, never scored)1open call ↗
  23. 23.FDIC BankFind ACTIVE flag (+2 if an active insured institution; otherwise no component)—open call ↗
  24. 24.Score = 100 + all points, clamped 0–100; grade A ≥ 90 · B ≥ 80 · C ≥ 70 · D ≥ 60 · else F75

Every input below is a public API call anyone can open. Counts move as the CFPB adds complaints, so re-running later gives the numbers as of that day; the arithmetic is fixed by the formula version. Formula 2026-09-14c; company as filed: Hanwha QCells USA Corp.

Score history — moves only when a public input or the published formula moves
No change since first computed.
Report a wrong figure — free, logged publicly

A request cannot change a figure — only a source re-pull or a method fix can, and the fix applies to every company. Outcome is logged at /corrections.

Source: Published formula over CFPB, FDA/CPSC, FDIC, federal courts — official records only · pulled Sep 24, 2026, 7:42 PM UTC

Every figure above is an official public record with its source named. Records are records: complaints are not findings, payments are disclosed and legal, adverse-event reports are unverified. Not medical, legal, or financial advice. Nothing here can be changed by payment. How we source this →

Share or embed this Record

Free to reuse with the link intact. The badge and card show the official record and update daily. Payment cannot change them.

Cookies run the site and measure what's working. Necessary ones are always on; you choose the rest. Policy.