Government forms register · US DOT / each state Unified Certification Program
49 CFR Part 26, Appendix F · 49 CFR 26.81
DBE Uniform Certification Application and the state UCP directory
Alpha Covenant Holdings, Government Forms Register: 49 CFR Part 26, Appendix F · 49 CFR 26.81 — DBE Uniform Certification Application and the state UCP directory (US DOT / each state Unified Certification Program); citation 49 CFR 26.81(g); 49 CFR 26.55; 49 CFR 26.37; 49 CFR 26, App. F; read 2026-10-08. https://alphacovenantholdings.com/forms/dot-dbe-ucp
Link, quote and embed freely with the citation intact. The agency is the author of the form and the rule; this register is a dated reading of them. No endorsement is implied and none may be claimed.
Disadvantaged Business Enterprise certification, directory and participation (49 CFR Part 26) — the steps as written
● a dated receipt is the record at this step · printable
| # | Step | Who | When | Record | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The firm applies to the state Unified Certification Program on the Uniform Certification Application with supporting documents. | firm | once; annual no-change affidavit | Uniform Certification Application (App. F); annual affidavit | 49 CFR 26.83; 49 CFR 26, App. F |
| 2 ● | The UCP certifies or denies and lists each certified firm in the public unified directory. | state UCP | on determination; directory updated | UCP directory row (name, NAICS, certifying agency) | 49 CFR 26.81(g); 49 CFR 26.83 |
| 3 ● | The recipient counts DBE participation only for certified DBEs performing a commercially useful function and monitors performance. | state DOT / transit recipient / prime | at commitment and during performance | directory read dated at commitment; monitoring records | 49 CFR 26.55; 49 CFR 26.37(a) |
How the auditor tests it
- DBE program compliance is tested under Special Tests and Provisions for the Highway Planning and Construction cluster and FTA programs: participation counted only for certified DBEs; monitoring of commercially useful function. — OMB Compliance Supplement, Part 4, 20.205 and 20.5xx, Section N
The steps as the regulation and the auditor's program state them, each with its citation. Nothing here is advice or a determination; the agency's text controls. A dated receipt is the record at the marked steps — it shows what the official file printed on the read date, not that the step was done correctly.
Upstream — the rule as printed
49 CFR 26.81 — § 26.81 Unified Certification Programs. · as of 2026-10-15 · last amended 2024-07-03
(a) You and all other DOT recipients in your state must participate in a Unified Certification Program (UCP). (1) All recipients in the same jurisdiction (normally a State) must sign an agreement establishing a UCP and submit the agreement to the Secretary for approval. (2) The agreement must provide for the establishment of a UCP meeting all the requirements of this section. The agreement must specify that the UCP will follow all certification procedures and standards of this part, on the same basis as recipients; that the UCP shall cooperate fully with oversight, review, and monitoring activities of DOT and its operating administrations; and that the UCP shall implement DOT directives and guidance concerning certification matters. The agreement shall also commit recipients to ensuring that the UCP has sufficient resources and expertise to carry out the requirements of this part. The agreement shall include an implementation schedule ensuring that the UCP is fully operational no later than 18 months following the approval of the agreement by the Secretary. (3) Subject to approval by the Secretary, the UCP in each state may take any form acceptable to the recipients in that state. (4) The Secretary shall review the UCP and approve it, disapprove it, or remand it to the recipients in the state for revisions. A complete agreement which is not disapproved or remanded within 180 days of its receipt is deemed to be accepted. (b) The UCP shall make all certification decisions on behalf of all DOT recipients in the state with respect to participation in the DOT DBE Program. (1) Certification decisions by the UCP shall be binding on all DOT recipients within the state. (2) The UCP shall provide “one-stop shopping” to applicants for certification, such that an applicant is required to apply only once for a DBE certification that will be honored by all recipients in the state. (3) All obligations of recipients with respect to certification and nondiscrimination must be carried out by UCPs, and recipients may use only UCPs that comply with the certification and nondiscrimination requirements of this part. (c) All certifications by UCPs shall be pre-certifications; i.e., certifications that have been made final before the due date for bids or offers on a contract on which a firm seeks to participate as a DBE. (d) A UCP is not required to process an application for certification from a firm having its principal place of business outside the state if the firm is not certified by the UCP in the state in which it maintains its principal place of business. The Jurisdiction of Original Certification UCP shall share its information and documents concerning the firm with other UCPs that are considering the firm's application. (e) Subject to DOT approval as provided in this section, recipients in two or more states may form a regional UCP. UCPs may also enter into written reciprocity agreements with other UCPs. Such an agreement shall outline the specific responsibilities of each participant. A UCP may accept the certification of any other UCP or DOT recipient. (f) Pending the establishment of UCPs meeting the requirements of this section, you may enter into agreements with other recipients, on a regional or inter-jurisdictional basis, to perform certification functions required by this part. You may also grant reciprocity to other recipient's certification decisions. (g) Each UCP must maintain a unified DBE directory containing, for all firms certified by the UCP (including those from other States certified under the provisions of this part), the information required by § 26.31. The UCP must make the directory available to the public electronically, on the internet. The UCP must update the electronic version of the directory by including additions, deletions, and other changes as soon as they are made. (h) Except as otherwise specified in this section, all provisions of this subpart and subpart D of this part pertaining to recipients also apply to UCPs. [64 FR 5126, Feb. 2, 1999, as amended at 76 FR 5100, Jan. 28, 2011; 89 FR 24974, Apr. 9, 2024; 89 FR 55089, July 3, 2024]
Amended: 2016-10-17, 2024-04-09, 2024-05-09, 2024-07-03 · SHA-256 of the XML as served: 0b3e27c0fb3fa30a24e9118fd065ed5d60b61f4e112fdfa87b7ca76103671e14 · eCFR
The eCFR is an editorial compilation maintained by the Office of the Federal Register and GPO; it is updated daily and is not the official legal edition (the annual Code of Federal Regulations is). Text printed here is as the eCFR served it on the read date.
49 CFR 26.55 — § 26.55 How is DBE participation counted toward goals? · as of 2026-10-15 · last amended 2025-10-03
(a) When a DBE participates in a contract, you count only the value of the work performed by the DBE toward DBE goals. (1) Count the entire amount of that portion of a construction contract (or other contract not covered by paragraph (a)(2) of this section) that is performed by the DBE's own forces. Include the cost of supplies and materials obtained by the DBE for the work of the contract, including supplies purchased or equipment leased by the DBE (except supplies and equipment the DBE subcontractor purchases or leases from the prime contractor or its affiliate). (2) Count the entire amount of fees or commissions charged by a DBE firm for providing a bona fide service, such as professional, technical, consultant, or managerial services, or for providing bonds or insurance specifically required for the performance of a DOT-assisted contract, toward DBE goals, provided you determine the fee to be reasonable and not excessive as compared with fees customarily allowed for similar services. (3) When a DBE subcontracts part of the work of its contract to another firm, the value of the subcontracted work may be counted toward DBE goals only if the DBE's subcontractor is itself a DBE. Work that a DBE subcontracts to a non-DBE firm does not count toward DBE goals. (b) When a DBE performs as a participant in a joint venture, count a portion of the total dollar value of the contract equal to the distinct, clearly defined portion of the work of the contract that the DBE performs with its own forces toward DBE goals. (c) Count expenditures to a DBE contractor toward DBE goals only if the DBE is performing a commercially useful function on that contract. (1) A DBE performs a commercially useful function when it is responsible for execution of the work of the contract and is carrying out its responsibilities by performing, managing, and supervising the work involved. To perform a commercially useful function, the DBE must also be responsible, with respect to materials and supplies used on the contract, for negotiating price, determining quality and quantity, ordering the material, and installing (where applicable) and paying for the material itself. To determine whether a DBE is performing a commercially useful function, you must evaluate the amount of work subcontracted, industry practices, whether the amount the firm is to be paid under the contract is commensurate with the work it is performing and the DBE credit claimed for its performance of the work, and other relevant factors. (2) A DBE does not perform a commercially useful function if its role is limited to that of an extra participant in a transaction, contract, or project through which funds are passed to obtain the appearance of DBE participation. In determining whether a DBE is such an extra participant, you must examine similar transactions, particularly those in which DBEs do not participate. (3) If a DBE does not perform or exercise responsibility for at least 30 percent of the total cost of its contract with its own work force, or the DBE subcontracts a greater portion of the work of a contract than would be expected within normal industry practice for the type of work involved, you must presume that it is not performing a commercially useful function. (4) When a DBE is presumed not to be performing a commercially useful function as provided in paragraph (c)(3) of this section, the DBE may present evidence to rebut this presumption. You may determine that the firm is performing a commercially useful function given the type of work involved and normal industry practices. (5) Your decisions on commercially useful function matters are subject to review by the concerned operating administration, but are not administratively appealable to DOT. (d) Use the following factors in determining whether a DBE trucking company is performing a commercially useful function: (1) The DBE must be responsible for the management and supervision of the entire trucking operation for which it is responsible on a particular contract, and there cannot be a contrived arrangement for the purpose of meeting DBE goals. (2) The DBE must itself own and operate at least one fully licensed, insured, and operational truck used on the contract. (3) The DBE receives credit for the total value of the transportation services it provides on the contract using trucks it owns, insures, and operates using drivers it employs. (4) The DBE may lease trucks from another DBE firm, including an owner-operator who is certified as a DBE. The DBE who leases trucks from another DBE receives credit for the total value of the transportation services the lessee DBE provides on the contract. (5) The DBE may also lease trucks from a non-DBE firm, including from an owner-operator. The DBE that leases trucks equipped with drivers from a non-DBE is entitled to credit for the total value of transportation services provided by non-DBE leased trucks equipped with drivers not to exceed the value of transportation services on the contract provided by DBE-owned trucks or leased trucks with DBE employee drivers. Additional participation by non-DBE owned trucks equipped with drivers receives credit only for the fee or commission it receives as a result of the lease arrangement. If a recipient chooses this approach, it must obtain written consent from the appropriate DOT operating administration. Example to paragraph (d)(5):DBE Firm X uses two of its own trucks on a contract. It leases two trucks from DBE Firm Y and six trucks equipped with drivers from non-DBE Firm Z. DBE credit would be awarded for the total value of transportation services provided by Firm X and Firm Y, and may also be awarded for the total value of transportation services provided by four of the six trucks provided by Firm Z. In all, full credit would be allowed for the participation of eight trucks. DBE credit could be awarded only for the fees or commissions pertaining to the remaining trucks Firm X receives as a result of the le […] full text at the eCFR link
Amended: 2016-10-17, 2024-04-09, 2024-05-09, 2024-07-03, 2025-10-03 · SHA-256 of the XML as served: 9f1bf9d96ee19dae63d8761e55facebc24b9ad388bc7ce52395932a769736c12 · eCFR
The eCFR is an editorial compilation maintained by the Office of the Federal Register and GPO; it is updated daily and is not the official legal edition (the annual Code of Federal Regulations is). Text printed here is as the eCFR served it on the read date.
49 CFR 26.37 — § 26.37 What are a recipient's responsibilities for monitoring? · as of 2026-10-15 · last amended 2025-10-03
(a) A recipient must implement appropriate mechanisms to ensure compliance with the requirements in this part by all program participants (e.g., applying legal and contract remedies available under Federal, State, and local law). The recipient must set forth these mechanisms in its DBE program. (b) A recipient's DBE program must also include a monitoring and enforcement mechanism to ensure that work committed, or in the case of DBE-neutral participation, the work subcontracted, to all DBEs at contract award or subsequently is performed by the DBEs to which the work was committed or subcontracted to, and such work is counted according to the requirements of § 26.55. This mechanism must include a written verification that you have reviewed contracting records and monitored the work site to ensure the counting of each DBE's participation is consistent with its function on the contract. The monitoring to which this paragraph (b) refers may be conducted in conjunction with monitoring of contract performance for other purposes such as a commercially useful function review. (c) You must effectively implement the following running tally mechanisms: (1) With respect to achieving your overall goal, you must use a running tally that provides for a frequent comparison of cumulative DBE awards/commitments to DOT-assisted prime contract awards to determine whether your current implementation of contract goals is projected to be sufficient to meet your annual goal. This mechanism should inform your decisions to implement goals on contracts to be advertised according to your established contract goal-setting process. (2) With respect to each DBE commitment, you must use a running tally that provides for a frequent comparison of payments made to each listed DBE relative to the progress of work, including payments for such work to the prime contractor to determine whether the contractor is on track with meeting its DBE commitment and whether any projected shortfall exists that requires the prime contractor's good faith efforts to address to meet the contract goal pursuant to § 26.53(g). [89 FR 24966, Apr. 9, 2024, as amended at 90 FR 47979, Oct. 3, 2025]
Amended: 2016-10-17, 2024-04-09, 2024-05-09, 2025-10-03 · SHA-256 of the XML as served: 3ade71940225fa216f81e8cec15fa7c3a2efdd7939f467b6387b820cbc13ebe1 · eCFR
The eCFR is an editorial compilation maintained by the Office of the Federal Register and GPO; it is updated daily and is not the official legal edition (the annual Code of Federal Regulations is). Text printed here is as the eCFR served it on the read date.
Federal Register documents naming this form
1 document(s) indexed · search · Documents in which the form number appears, as the Federal Register indexes them — Paperwork Reduction Act notices print the OMB control number and the current revision; other documents merely mention the form.
- 1997-05-30 · Proposed Rule · Transportation Department — Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprise in Department of Transportation Programs
Upstream of the form: the regulation text as the eCFR served it on the read date, with the dates it was amended, and the Federal Register documents that name the form. The agency is the author; this is a dated read, not an interpretation.
Not legal advice, not a compliance determination, not a statement that any filer's certification is true or false. Form numbers and line numbers are as published on the date noted and may be renumbered by their agencies; the official page controls. Audit findings quoted are the auditor's words as filed at the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, cited by report id; they describe a documentation gap, not a conclusion about any party. · All forms · Corrections
Forms Desk
Ask what the rule requires. Every sentence cites or the desk says the sources don't answer.
Answers come only from the Forms Register, the procedure steps as the regulation writes them, the eCFR text and the customer's own filing. The desk never says whether a duty was met, whether a cost is allowable, or what an auditor will conclude.