Government forms register · DOL Wage and Hour Division
WH-347
WH-347 Payroll (for contractors' optional use) and Statement of Compliance — Davis-Bacon certified payroll
Alpha Covenant Holdings, Government Forms Register: WH-347 — WH-347 Payroll (for contractors' optional use) and Statement of Compliance — Davis-Bacon certified payroll (DOL Wage and Hour Division); citation 29 CFR 5.5(a)(3)(ii); 29 CFR 5.12; 40 U.S.C. 3142; read 2026-10-08. https://alphacovenantholdings.com/forms/wh-347
Link, quote and embed freely with the citation intact. The agency is the author of the form and the rule; this register is a dated reading of them. No endorsement is implied and none may be claimed.
Davis-Bacon and related acts on federally funded construction (29 CFR 5) — the steps as written
● a dated receipt is the record at this step · printable
| # | Step | Who | When | Record | Citation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Put the wage determination and the labor standards clauses into the contract and every subcontract. | contracting agency; prime for subs | at solicitation and subcontract | contract and subcontract | 29 CFR 5.5(a); 29 CFR 5.6(a)(1) |
| 2 ● | Do not award to a person or firm on the WHD ineligible (debarred) list; check SAM Exclusions as well where federal funds flow. | contracting agency; prime for subs | before award and before each subcontract | the dated SAM read; the WHD list is printed 'not read' with its official link because DOL refuses automated reads | 29 CFR 5.12(a)(1); 2 CFR 180.300; FHWA-1273 §XI |
| 3 | Each contractor and subcontractor submits a weekly payroll with a signed Statement of Compliance. | contractor and each subcontractor | weekly, within 7 days of the pay date | WH-347 or equivalent with Statement of Compliance | 29 CFR 5.5(a)(3)(ii) |
| 4 | The agency reviews payrolls and conducts employee interviews. | contracting agency | during performance | payroll review and interview records | 29 CFR 5.6(a)(3) |
| 5 | Retain payrolls and basic records three years after completion. | contractor | 3 years | payroll records | 29 CFR 5.5(a)(3)(i) |
How the auditor tests it
- Federal-aid highway: the division office reviews the contracting agency's labor compliance, including that certified payrolls were obtained and reviewed and FHWA-1273 was physically incorporated. — 23 CFR 635.117; 23 CFR 633.102
- Single audit: where Part 4 of the program names wage-rate requirements, test that payrolls were obtained and reviewed. — OMB Compliance Supplement, Part 3, Section N — Special Tests and Provisions (Wage Rate Requirements), where applicable
The steps as the regulation and the auditor's program state them, each with its citation. Nothing here is advice or a determination; the agency's text controls. A dated receipt is the record at the marked steps — it shows what the official file printed on the read date, not that the step was done correctly.
Upstream — the rule as printed
29 CFR 5.5 — § 5.5 Contract provisions and related matters. · as of 2026-10-15 · last amended 2025-01-15
(a) Required contract clauses. The Agency head will cause or require the contracting officer to require the contracting officer to insert in full, or (for contracts covered by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR chapter 1)) by reference, in any contract in excess of $2,000 which is entered into for the actual construction, alteration and/or repair, including painting and decorating, of a public building or public work, or building or work financed in whole or in part from Federal funds or in accordance with guarantees of a Federal agency or financed from funds obtained by pledge of any contract of a Federal agency to make a loan, grant or annual contribution (except where a different meaning is expressly indicated), and which is subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the laws referenced by § 5.1, the following clauses (or any modifications thereof to meet the particular needs of the agency, Provided, That such modifications are first approved by the Department of Labor): (1) Minimum wages—(i) Wage rates and fringe benefits. All laborers and mechanics employed or working upon the site of the work (or otherwise working in construction or development of the project under a development statute), will be paid unconditionally and not less often than once a week, and without subsequent deduction or rebate on any account (except such payroll deductions as are permitted by regulations issued by the Secretary of Labor under the Copeland Act (29 CFR part 3)), the full amount of basic hourly wages and bona fide fringe benefits (or cash equivalents thereof) due at time of payment computed at rates not less than those contained in the wage determination of the Secretary of Labor which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, regardless of any contractual relationship which may be alleged to exist between the contractor and such laborers and mechanics. As provided in paragraphs (d) and (e) of this section, the appropriate wage determinations are effective by operation of law even if they have not been attached to the contract. Contributions made or costs reasonably anticipated for bona fide fringe benefits under the Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. 3141(2)(B)) on behalf of laborers or mechanics are considered wages paid to such laborers or mechanics, subject to the provisions of paragraph (a)(1)(v) of this section; also, regular contributions made or costs incurred for more than a weekly period (but not less often than quarterly) under plans, funds, or programs which cover the particular weekly period, are deemed to be constructively made or incurred during such weekly period. Such laborers and mechanics must be paid the appropriate wage rate and fringe benefits on the wage determination for the classification(s) of work actually performed, without regard to skill, except as provided in paragraph (a)(4) of this section. Laborers or mechanics performing work in more than one classification may be compensated at the rate specified for each classification for the time actually worked therein: Provided, That the employer's payroll records accurately set forth the time spent in each classification in which work is performed. The wage determination (including any additional classifications and wage rates conformed under paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section) and the Davis-Bacon poster (WH-1321) must be posted at all times by the contractor and its subcontractors at the site of the work in a prominent and accessible place where it can be easily seen by the workers. (ii) Frequently recurring classifications. (A) In addition to wage and fringe benefit rates that have been determined to be prevailing under the procedures set forth in 29 CFR part 1, a wage determination may contain, pursuant to § 1.3(f), wage and fringe benefit rates for classifications of laborers and mechanics for which conformance requests are regularly submitted pursuant to paragraph (a)(1)(iii) of this section, provided that: (1) The work performed by the classification is not performed by a classification in the wage determination for which a prevailing wage rate has been determined; (2) The classification is used in the area by the construction industry; and (3) The wage rate for the classification bears a reasonable relationship to the prevailing wage rates contained in the wage determination. (B) The Administrator will establish wage rates for such classifications in accordance with paragraph (a)(1)(iii)(A)(3) of this section. Work performed in such a classification must be paid at no less than the wage and fringe benefit rate listed on the wage determination for such classification. (iii) Conformance. (A) The contracting officer must require that any class of laborers or mechanics, including helpers, which is not listed in the wage determination and which is to be employed under the contract be classified in conformance with the wage determination. Conformance of an additional classification and wage rate and fringe benefits is appropriate only when the following criteria have been met: (1) The work to be performed by the classification requested is not performed by a classification in the wage determination; and (2) The classification is used in the area by the construction industry; and (3) The proposed wage rate, including any bona fide fringe benefits, bears a reasonable relationship to the wage rates contained in the wage determination. (B) The conformance process may not be used to split, subdivide, or otherwise avoid application of classifications listed in the wage determination. (C) If the contractor and the laborers and mechanics to be employed in the classification (if known), or their representatives, and the contracting officer agree on the classification and wage rate (including the amount designated for fringe benefits where appropriate), a report of the action taken will be sent by the contracting officer by email to DBAconformance@dol.gov. The Administrator, or an authorized representative, will approve, […] full text at the eCFR link
Amended: 2017-01-03, 2017-01-09, 2018-01-02, 2019-01-23, 2022-01-14, 2022-01-18, 2023-01-13, 2023-01-15, 2023-08-23, 2023-10-23, 2024-01-11, 2024-01-15, 2025-01-10, 2025-01-15 · SHA-256 of the XML as served: 6663c190cdc82b9503724ed55d049100549f907c8cfbdd7ccc80d4444854aa06 · eCFR
The eCFR is an editorial compilation maintained by the Office of the Federal Register and GPO; it is updated daily and is not the official legal edition (the annual Code of Federal Regulations is). Text printed here is as the eCFR served it on the read date.
29 CFR 5.12 — § 5.12 Debarment proceedings. · as of 2026-10-15 · last amended 2023-10-23
(a) Debarment standard and ineligible list. (1) Whenever any contractor or subcontractor is found by the Secretary of Labor to have disregarded their obligations to workers or subcontractors under the Davis-Bacon Act, any of the other applicable statutes referenced by § 5.1, this part, or part 3 of this subtitle, such contractor or subcontractor and their responsible officers, if any, and any firm, corporation, partnership, or association in which such contractor, subcontractor, or responsible officer has an interest will be ineligible for a period of 3 years to be awarded any contract or subcontract of the United States or the District of Columbia and any contract or subcontract subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the statutes referenced by § 5.1. (2) In cases arising under contracts covered by the Davis-Bacon Act, the Administrator will transmit to the Comptroller General the name(s) of the contractors or subcontractors and their responsible officers, if any, and any firms, corporations, partnerships, or associations in which the contractors, subcontractors, or responsible officers are known to have an interest, who have been found to have disregarded their obligations to workers or subcontractors, and the recommendation of the Secretary of Labor or authorized representative regarding debarment. In cases arising under contracts covered by any of the applicable statutes referenced by § 5.1 other than the Davis-Bacon Act, the Administrator determines the name(s) of the contractors or subcontractors and their responsible officers, if any, and any firms, corporations, partnerships, or associations in which the contractors, subcontractors, or responsible officers are known to have an interest, to be debarred. The names of such ineligible persons or firms will be published on SAM or its successor website, and an ineligible person or firm will be ineligible for a period of 3 years from the date of publication of their name on the ineligible list, to be awarded any contract or subcontract of the United States or the District of Columbia and any contract or subcontract subject to the labor standards provisions of any of the statutes referenced by § 5.1. (b) Procedure. (1) In addition to cases under which debarment action is initiated pursuant to § 5.11, whenever as a result of an investigation conducted by the Federal agency or the Department of Labor, and where the Administrator finds reasonable cause to believe that a contractor or subcontractor has committed violations which constitute a disregard of its obligations to workers or subcontractors under the Davis-Bacon Act, the labor standards provisions of any of the other applicable statutes referenced by § 5.1, this part, or part 3 of this subtitle, the Administrator will notify by registered or certified mail to the last known address or by any other means normally assuring delivery, the contractor or subcontractor and responsible officers, if any, and any firms, corporations, partnerships, or associations in which the contractors, subcontractors, or responsible officers are known to have an interest of the finding. (i) The Administrator will afford such contractor, subcontractor, responsible officer, and any other parties notified an opportunity for a hearing as to whether debarment action should be taken under paragraph (a) of this section. The Administrator will furnish to those notified a summary of the investigative findings. (ii) If the contractor, subcontractor, responsible officer, or any other parties notified wish to request a hearing as to whether debarment action should be taken, such a request must be made by letter or by any other means normally assuring delivery, sent within 30 days of the date of the notification from the Administrator, and must set forth any findings which are in dispute and the basis for such disputed findings, including any affirmative defenses to be raised. (iii) Upon timely receipt of such request for a hearing, the Administrator will refer the case to the Chief Administrative Law Judge by Order of Reference, with an attached copy of the notification from the Administrator and the responses of the contractor, subcontractor, responsible officers, or any other parties notified, for designation of an Administrative Law Judge to conduct such hearings as may be necessary to determine the matters in dispute. (iv) In considering debarment under any of the statutes referenced by § 5.1 other than the Davis-Bacon Act, the Administrative Law Judge will issue an order concerning whether the contractor, subcontractor, responsible officer, or any other party notified is to be debarred in accordance with paragraph (a) of this section. In considering debarment under the Davis-Bacon Act, the Administrative Law Judge will issue a recommendation as to whether the contractor, subcontractor, responsible officers, or any other party notified should be debarred under 40 U.S.C. 3144(b). (2) Hearings under this section will be conducted in accordance with part 6 of this subtitle. If no hearing is requested within 30 days of the date of the notification from the Administrator, the Administrator's findings will be final, except with respect to recommendations regarding debarment under the Davis-Bacon Act, as set forth in paragraph (a)(2) of this section. (c) Interests of debarred parties. (1) A finding as to whether persons or firms whose names appear on the ineligible list have an interest under 40 U.S.C. 3144(b) or paragraph (a) of this section in any other firm, corporation, partnership, or association, may be made through investigation, hearing, or otherwise. (2)(i) The Administrator, on their own motion or after receipt of a request for a determination pursuant to paragraph (c)(3) of this section, may make a finding on the issue of interest. (ii) If the Administrator determines that there may be an interest but finds that there is insufficient evidence to render a final ruling thereon, the Administrator may r […] full text at the eCFR link
Amended: 2017-01-03, 2017-01-09, 2023-08-23, 2023-10-23 · SHA-256 of the XML as served: 18695594270e976e3c832b68c70559efe7b37f15f87cc0dfc270621888929738 · eCFR
The eCFR is an editorial compilation maintained by the Office of the Federal Register and GPO; it is updated daily and is not the official legal edition (the annual Code of Federal Regulations is). Text printed here is as the eCFR served it on the read date.
Federal Register documents naming this form
42 document(s) indexed · search · Documents in which the form number appears, as the Federal Register indexes them — Paperwork Reduction Act notices print the OMB control number and the current revision; other documents merely mention the form.
- 2025-10-03 · Notice · General Services Administration — Submission for OMB Review; General Services Administration Regulation; Construction Payrolls and Basic Records
- 2025-07-18 · Notice · General Services Administration — Information Collection; General Services Administration Regulation; Construction Payrolls and Basic Records
- 2024-11-27 · Notice · Labor Department — Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for OMB Review; Comment Request; Davis-Bacon Certified Payroll
- 2024-08-30 · Notice · Labor Department — Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request; Information Collections: Davis-Bacon Certified Payroll
- 2024-06-25 · Rule · Treasury Department — Increased Amounts of Credit or Deduction for Satisfying Certain Prevailing Wage and Registered Apprenticeship Requirements
- 2023-08-23 · Rule · Labor Department — Updating the Davis-Bacon and Related Acts Regulations
- 2022-08-09 · Notice · General Services Administration — Submission for OMB Review; General Services Administration Regulation; Construction Payrolls and Basic Records
- 2022-05-06 · Notice · General Services Administration — Information Collection; General Services Administration Regulation; Construction Payrolls and Basic Records
Upstream of the form: the regulation text as the eCFR served it on the read date, with the dates it was amended, and the Federal Register documents that name the form. The agency is the author; this is a dated read, not an interpretation.
Not legal advice, not a compliance determination, not a statement that any filer's certification is true or false. Form numbers and line numbers are as published on the date noted and may be renumbered by their agencies; the official page controls. Audit findings quoted are the auditor's words as filed at the Federal Audit Clearinghouse, cited by report id; they describe a documentation gap, not a conclusion about any party. · All forms · Corrections
Forms Desk
Ask what the rule requires. Every sentence cites or the desk says the sources don't answer.
Answers come only from the Forms Register, the procedure steps as the regulation writes them, the eCFR text and the customer's own filing. The desk never says whether a duty was met, whether a cost is allowable, or what an auditor will conclude.